Building Smarter AI Workflows and Measuring Marketing That Matters with Dale Bertrand

In Podcasts, The Business of Marketing Podcast by A. Lee Judge

How Marketers Can Leverage AI Without Losing Their Value with Dale Bertrand

Start Where AI Already Works

Teams often reach for the wrong automation first. They pick a big, visible AI workflows that touch the CRM, the website, the analytics platform, and three outside data sources, then they wonder why it never ships.

On this episode, we have Dale Bertrand, Founder and CEO of Fire&Spark, who has spent two decades turning organic search into a revenue engine for global brands, and his background is in computer engineering rather than marketing. In this The Business of Marketing conversation, host A. Lee Judge and co-host Rocio Osuna talk with Dale (LinkedIn) about where AI agents belong inside a marketing team, why the upfront work of building context is the new job, and how to measure marketing in a way that leadership respects. Two ideas anchor the conversation: automate to 80% and walk away, and give up on attribution before it embarrasses you.

Dale’s advice is to start with something small and proven.

His filter is simple. Choose a workflow that is tedious, repetitive, and something you already do often, so you know it works. Make sure it needs no data, or data from only one system such as your CRM or GA4. The more integrations a task requires, the higher the chance it breaks. Content workflows and research workflows are good first candidates, because they rarely depend on a tangle of connected tools.

Lee shared a working example from his own company. The process of booking guests for this very podcast used to be a chain of copy and paste steps: pulling invites, finding the recording link, dropping it into an email. His team handed the full standard operating procedure to AI, mapped it against the tools they already owned, and used Claude to rebuild it. Booking, guest research, and a draft question set now happen in one step. The team still reviews the questions and watches the calendar, which is the point.

Why Marketers Should Automate to 80% and Stop Chasing Attribution

The biggest mistake Dale sees is the chase for perfect. That last stretch of automation, the final 10 or 20 percent, is where people pour in twice the effort for a fraction of the return.

The smarter move is to bank the 80% win and apply the same effort to a brand new workflow. Dale put it this way:

“When you get to that 80% mark, you’ve just taken a ton of work off your plate. Now you need to decide: am I going to go for that last 20% that’s probably going to take me twice as long as the 80% took me, or am I going to start automating a different workflow where I’m going to get more bang for the buck?” ~ Dale Bertrand

For the part the machine cannot finish cleanly, put a person on it. Dale joked that the real headline of marketing’s AI moment is that he replaced AI with humans, because the human is what closes the gap on that final slice.

For AI Workflows, Context Is the Work Now

The value of an AI workflow is set long before it runs. It comes from the context you feed it. Dale described building a project management workflow that pulled from documents, emails, transcripts, and task lists. Assembling that context took him four hours, even with AI helping. What he got back was a system that runs daily, writes project plans, supports budget decisions, and sends status updates to stakeholders.

That tradeoff is the real skill. Time spent curating context up front against hours saved on the back end. And it points to where new roles are coming from, because someone has to build, train, and supervise these agents. AI amplifies the competencies a person already brings to the table, and that cuts both ways. As Dale said:

“You’re in trouble if you’re not interested in learning the technology or you don’t have expertise worth amplifying with the technology.” ~ Dale Bertrand

Both Lee and Dale connected this to the next generation entering the workforce. The students who learn the fundamentals and then use AI to execute will have an edge. The ones who let AI do their thinking never build the expertise that makes the tool worth anything. Dale, as an employer, treats it as a sorting mechanism: the people who learned despite easy shortcuts are exactly who he wants to hire.

Stop Speaking Marketing to the Business

The conversation then turned to a problem that predates AI and gets worse with it: marketers measure the wrong things for the wrong audience. Rankings, organic traffic, impressions, and likes are channel metrics. Leadership does not care about channel metrics. A CEO or CFO cares about business growth metrics, things like customer acquisition cost, conversion rates once a buyer talks to sales, and payback period on content.

Dale framed the gap as a language barrier. The marketer speaks English and explains canonical tags and traffic trends. The executive speaks Spanish and cares about financial outcomes. Lee put it plainly: keep marketing language inside the marketing team, and speak the business’s language when you walk into the room with leadership.

The reason is not comprehension. It is interest. As Lee said about a salesperson hearing about a LinkedIn post that earned 300 impressions, “Did it move my deal forward? … I don’t care about your impressions or your likes.” A number only matters if it connects to a deal moving forward.

Attribution Is Broken, So Measure Contribution

This is where Lee laid out a position he has been testing on stage. Stop trying to attribute pipeline to a single channel, because that machinery is broken. Focus on contribution instead. When a salesperson says a prospect already knew the product before the first call, marketing contributed to that. When a customer leaves a webinar feeling educated about where the company is headed, marketing contributed to that. Mark it down. The honest answer beats a fabricated hard number invented to satisfy a leader who wants precision.

Dale agreed and added a sharper edge. The hard numbers marketers used to report were never as solid as they looked; they were the illusion of precision. Accuracy that points you in the right direction is more useful than false precision that does not. Then he pushed Lee’s contribution idea one step further: translate it into dollars.

On one client project, his team quantified the value of a competitor’s comparison content and showed the client that roughly $12 million of their sales pipeline was being influenced by content the competitor published and they refused to publish. That figure ended the debate. Dale calls the method fuzzy math: build reasonable assumptions, attach a dollar value, and make a credible case that marketing influenced those dollars. Fuzzy math beats no math, and it speaks the language the C suite actually understands.

Continuing the Conversation

You can connect with Dale Bertrand on LinkedIn, learn about his agency at fireandspark.com, and find his speaking work at dalebertrand.com. Fire&Spark focuses on AI search and GEO, and helps marketing teams find the right use cases for AI agents and workflows. Dale has a full slate of fall events, including Content Marketing World, the Unbound Conference, and Digital Summit workshops on AI agents and optimizing for AI search.

The Business of Marketing podcast is produced by Content Monsta, the B2B digital marketing content company. For more on building a sales and marketing engine that leadership trusts, Lee’s book CASH is available at aleejudge.com.

Thanks for listening to The Business of Marketing podcast.

Feel free to contact the hosts and ask additional questions, we would love to answer them on the show.

Full Transcript